Re: Proposals for RoboCupRescue 2003 regulations

From: Lin Padgham (linpa@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au)
Date: Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 05:42:49 GMT

  • Next message: Ranjit Nair: "Re: Proposals for RoboCupRescue 2003 regulations"

    I would actually like to see us use the same languages as commonly
    used in FIPA/Agentcities initiative as this is also a major
    multi-agent domain. This would mean ACL + SL0 probably.

    Regards,

    Lin

    > Dear All,
    >
    > > My main question is why there is a need of definition of an explicit ACL for
    > > agent conversation? If you think there is need, I suggest KQML.
    >
    > The unlimited communication makes the simulation not a multi-agent
    > problem but a single-controller problem. The unlimitation enables
    > agents to share information and their decision. Multi-agent systems are
    > more appropriate for RoboCup-Rescue, originated by RoboCup-Soccer.
    >
    > On the other hand, to simulate or to exceed human intelligence is the
    > great goal of AI. The main purpose of the competion is to provide an
    > evaluation of AI methods, so it is a good choice to try to simulate
    > human's restriction.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Tetsuhiko Koto
    > koto@takopen.cs.uec.ac.jp



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 06:05:21 GMT