Re: Re: [rescue:5501] Questions about kernel

From: Mazda Ahmadi (mazdaah@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue 01 Oct 2002 - 17:27:50 GMT

  • Next message: egabriel@beenet.pp.sci.fi: "(no subject)"

    Dear Bebe,

    100% it's your misunderstanding. Be sure of it and go check
    your code. Koto have implemented the kernel. I personaly have
    worked with kernel and it sends the building information.

    Regards,
    -Mazda

    >From: "Jiri Biba student" <bibaj@feld.cvut.cz>
    >To: r-resc@ISI.EDU
    >Subject: Re: Re: [rescue:5501] Questions about kernel
    >Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:14:58 +0200
    >
    >
    > Hello Tetsuhiko Koto,
    >
    > > Dear Bebe,
    > >
    > > > 1) I have found out, that kernel 0.39 doesn't send possitions of
    > > > buildings and nodes, that were not visited (far objects on other side
    > > > of the city) by an agent. Kernel 0.34 did it (in first 5 kernel
    >cycles).
    > >
    > > I think it's your misunderstanding. In spite of its version, the kernel
    > > sends the positions of all the buildings and the roads (the nodes and
    > > the edges) at the initialization phase.
    >
    > I don't think so - if it was our mistake, agent would be able
    >to parse any information neither on kernel 0.39 nor 0.34. If the format of
    >data did not change, there cannot be any mistake on our side. We use
    >NITRescue library as a template.
    >
    > >
    > > > 2) Kernel doesn't send complete informations about objects close
    > > > to the agent - often missing possition. Is it a real-world simulation
    > > > (information uncertainty) or bug?
    > >
    > > The kernel always sends these positions.
    >
    > I'm not sure of it - we know X,Y by approximatelly 50 percent
    > of objects...
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue 01 Oct 2002 - 17:58:35 GMT