Hi!
I might be able to help on this. To make the transition fast, I think
we should change as little as possible to the existent protocol. I'm a
newbie in Rescue, so I still don't know if there are any more serious
problems with the protocol, besides the UDP thing. If not, maybe we
should change the transport to UDP, delete the LongUDP stuff, and maybe
send a header with the message size, althought that may not be
necessary, because de messages themselfs alredy have their size
built-in.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 23 de ago de 2004, at 1:55, Mohsen Izadi wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> In our team, Arash has some ideas about a reliable
> and yet a high performance TCP-based protocol which
> he is currently working on and is in the design
> phase.
>
> He would be happy to work in cooperation with
> anyone who is interested in this subject. You can
> contact him via e-mail using the following addresses:
>
> arash_rahimi@ftml.net
> rahimi@ce.aut.ac.ir
>
>
> Regards,
> Mohsen Izadi,
> S.O.S. Member
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
"I felt like putting a bullet between
the eyes of every Panda that wouldn't
scr*w to save its species." -- Fight Club
Miguel Arroz - arroz@guiamac.com - http://www.guiamac.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon 23 Aug 2004 - 13:20:06 GMT